VS
Compare CIBC MSCI USA Equity Index ETF (CUEH) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CUEH and HULC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, CUEH features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, CUEH has returned 6.31% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 10% with +$159 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUEH
HULC
| AuM | $4.08 M | $753.56 M |
| Management Fees | 0.05% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.05% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.16% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUEH | -1.62% | +2.72% | +6.31% | +13.34% | +56.01% |
HULC | -2.92% | +5.54% | +10.00% | +18.12% | +77.13% | |
| Flows | CUEH | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$0 M | -$1 M | +$1 M |
HULC | +$23 M | +$61 M | +$159 M | +$225 M | +$88 M |
CUEH vs HULC exposure
Countries
CUEH
USA
96.13%
HULC
USA
97.63%
Sectors
CUEH
Technology
45.12%
Finance
13.02%
Healthcare
8.84%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.82%
Industrials
8.16%
Other
16.04%
HULC
Technology
45.00%
Finance
12.93%
Healthcare
9.06%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.74%
Industrials
8.24%
Other
16.03%
As of July 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUEH
NVIDIA Corp.
7.15%
Apple, Inc.
6.58%
Microsoft Corp.
4.08%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.22%
Broadcom Inc.
2.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.02%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.07%
Apple, Inc.
6.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.19%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
Tesla, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Diversification
CUEH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 529 total
35.53%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
35.78%
Characteristics
Compare
CUEH
HULC
| Provider | CIBC | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA NTR Index - CAD Hedged | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.36% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 23, 2023 | February 6, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CUEH and HULC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CUEH or HULC?
As of July 29, 2026, CUEH has returned 6.31% year to date, while HULC has returned 10.00%. HULC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUEH or HULC?
As of July 29, 2026, CUEH manages $4.08 M in assets, while HULC manages $753.56 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUEH and HULC managed?
CUEH is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the MSCI USA NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CUEH and HULC emphasize?
CUEH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CUEH or HULC?
Year to date, CUEH has seen -$0.21 M in net flows, compared with +$158.95 M for HULC. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CUEH and HULC compare?
CUEH has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of CUEH and HULC?
CUEH's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. HULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CUEH or HULC?
CUEH holds 519 securities, while HULC holds 497. On holdings count, CUEH is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.