Compare CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA) vs CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CUSA and CUSA.B provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CUSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for CUSA.B. Performance-wise, CUSA has returned 5.61% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas CUSA.B is at 8.25% with +$34 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUSA
CUSA.B
| AuM | $6.74 M | $292.01 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | -0.15% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUSA | -1.99% | +6.92% | +5.61% | +18.95% | - |
CUSA.B | +0.09% | +10.42% | +8.25% | +23.52% | +81.84% | |
| Flows | CUSA | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | - |
CUSA.B | +$7 M | +$9 M | +$34 M | +$43 M | +$45 M |
CUSA vs CUSA.B exposure
Countries
CUSA
USA
96.78%
CUSA.B
USA
96.78%
Sectors
CUSA
Information Technology
35.48%
Communication Services
11.40%
Consumer Discretionary
10.14%
Financials
9.58%
Health Care
8.52%
Industrials
7.96%
Other
16.92%
CUSA.B
Information Technology
35.48%
Communication Services
11.40%
Consumer Discretionary
10.14%
Financials
9.58%
Health Care
8.52%
Industrials
7.96%
Other
16.92%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUSA
NVIDIA
7.52%
APPLE
6.30%
MICROSOFT-T
4.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.61%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.10%
META PLATFORMS
2.14%
TESLA
1.78%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.37%
CUSA.B
NVIDIA
7.52%
APPLE
6.30%
MICROSOFT-T
4.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.61%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.10%
META PLATFORMS
2.14%
TESLA
1.78%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.37%
Diversification
CUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.88%
CUSA.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.88%
Characteristics
Compare
CUSA
CUSA.B
| Provider | CI | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.90% | 0.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about CUSA and CUSA.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CUSA or CUSA.B?
As of June 10, 2026, CUSA has returned 5.61% year to date, while CUSA.B has returned 8.25%. CUSA.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUSA or CUSA.B?
As of June 10, 2026, CUSA manages $6.74 M in assets, while CUSA.B manages $292.01 M. CUSA.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUSA and CUSA.B managed?
CUSA is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark. CUSA.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CUSA and CUSA.B emphasize?
CUSA is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. CUSA.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CUSA or CUSA.B?
Year to date, CUSA has seen +$4.05 M in net flows, compared with +$34.26 M for CUSA.B. CUSA.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CUSA and CUSA.B compare?
CUSA has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while CUSA.B has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of CUSA and CUSA.B?
CUSA's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. CUSA.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CUSA or CUSA.B?
CUSA holds 466 securities, while CUSA.B holds 466. On holdings count, CUSA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CUSA and CUSA.B
CI Global Asset Management launches the CI U.S. 500 Index ETF
The currency-hedged ETF provides low-cost exposure to the U.S. stock market.
Posted on 5/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.