VS
When evaluating costs, CUTE features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUTE
HBNK
| AuM | $1.01 M | $807.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.44% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | +6.04% | +19.91% | +35.86% | +71.53% | +159.08% | |
| Flows | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | -$44 M | +$39 M | -$461 M | -$767 M | +$3 M |
CUTE vs HBNK exposure
Countries
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CUTE
HBNK
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.48% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CUTE and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUTE or HBNK?
As of July 16, 2026, CUTE manages $1.01 M in assets, while HBNK manages $807.27 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUTE and HBNK managed?
CUTE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of CUTE and HBNK compare?
CUTE has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about CUTE and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.