VS
When evaluating costs, CUTE features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUTE
HEWB
| AuM | $1.01 M | $353.97 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.83% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | +6.03% | +19.86% | +35.73% | +71.14% | +157.48% | |
| Flows | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | +$9 M | +$16 M | +$23 M | +$22 M | +$25 M |
CUTE vs HEWB exposure
Countries
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CUTE
HEWB
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2026 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CUTE and HEWB
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUTE or HEWB?
As of July 16, 2026, CUTE manages $1.01 M in assets, while HEWB manages $353.97 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUTE and HEWB managed?
CUTE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of CUTE and HEWB compare?
CUTE has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about CUTE and HEWB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
HEB ETF Spotlight: Hamilton's Newest Addition to its ETF Offering
Meet HEB, Hamilton’s new low-cost Big Six Canadian Bank ETF.
Posted on 5/2/2023 by ETF Market Canada inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.