VS
When evaluating costs, CUTE features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUTE
XIC
| AuM | $1.01 M | $31,310.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
XIC | +0.59% | +3.22% | +12.50% | +31.70% | +89.28% | |
| Flows | CUTE | - | - | - | - | - |
XIC | +$820 M | +$1,912 M | +$6,530 M | +$7,821 M | +$12,618 M |
CUTE vs XIC exposure
Countries
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.41%
Sectors
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
39.60%
Non-Energy Materials
18.18%
Energy
16.99%
Industrials
8.23%
Other
16.99%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Shopify, Inc.
4.05%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.32%
Bank of Montreal
3.18%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.81%
Brookfield Corp.
2.78%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.62%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.55%
Diversification
CUTE
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 220 total
36.78%
Characteristics
Compare
CUTE
XIC
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | July 13, 2026 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CUTE and XIC
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUTE or XIC?
As of July 16, 2026, CUTE manages $1.01 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.31 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUTE and XIC managed?
CUTE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of CUTE and XIC compare?
CUTE has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about CUTE and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.