VS
When evaluating costs, CWW features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.9% for PGRX. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CWW
PGRX
| AuM | $294.70 M | $2.08 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.90% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.90% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.03% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWW | -2.55% | +4.43% | +3.38% | +1.14% | +40.07% |
PGRX | +9.86% | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | CWW | -$2 M | -$5 M | -$8 M | -$21 M | -$114 M |
PGRX | +$1 M | - | - | - | - |
CWW vs PGRX exposure
Countries
CWW
USA
58.88%
United Kingdom
11.24%
Brazil
10.47%
Other
19.40%
PGRX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CWW
Utilities
43.08%
Industrials
36.59%
Non-Energy Materials
15.90%
PGRX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of August 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CWW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.73%
Xylem, Inc.
7.40%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.26%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.71%
Veralto Corp.
5.23%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.13%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.08%
Severn Trent Plc
3.94%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.56%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.40%
PGRX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CWW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 67 total
52.44%
PGRX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CWW
PGRX
| Provider | iShares | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.29% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | June 4, 2007 | June 22, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about CWW and PGRX
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CWW or PGRX?
As of August 20, 2026, CWW manages $294.70 M in assets, while PGRX manages $2.08 M. CWW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CWW and PGRX managed?
CWW is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Water Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. PGRX is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
How do the fees of CWW and PGRX compare?
CWW has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while PGRX has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.