VS
Compare CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR) vs iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. DGR provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while XUSC.U is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, DGR features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.12% for XUSC.U. Performance-wise, DGR has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas XUSC.U is at 13.65% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DGR
XUSC.U
| AuM | $221.11 M | $55.71 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.12% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.13% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.55% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DGR | +1.19% | +0.52% | +10.86% | +12.15% | +52.97% |
XUSC.U | -0.08% | -0.21% | +13.65% | +15.94% | - | |
| Flows | DGR | -$8 M | -$8 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$105 M |
XUSC.U | +$3 M | +$7 M | +$6 M | +$7 M | +$0 M |
DGR vs XUSC.U exposure
Countries
DGR
USA
100.17%
XUSC.U
USA
96.89%
Sectors
DGR
Technology
42.26%
Healthcare
12.92%
Industrials
9.69%
Finance
7.17%
Other
27.95%
XUSC.U
Technology
37.51%
Finance
15.51%
Healthcare
11.10%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.94%
Industrials
8.88%
Other
18.06%
As of November 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DGR
NVIDIA Corp.
8.95%
Microsoft Corp.
7.79%
Apple, Inc.
4.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.76%
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.03%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.54%
Johnson & Johnson
2.39%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.20%
XUSC.U
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
3.14%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.97%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.96%
Broadcom Inc.
2.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.23%
Tesla, Inc.
1.85%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.85%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.74%
Diversification
DGR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 197 total
39.48%
XUSC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.88%
Characteristics
Compare
DGR
XUSC.U
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.09% | 0.93% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 12, 2016 | July 9, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about DGR and XUSC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DGR or XUSC.U?
As of November 4, 2026, DGR has returned 10.86% year to date, while XUSC.U has returned 13.65%. XUSC.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DGR or XUSC.U?
As of November 4, 2026, DGR manages $221.11 M in assets, while XUSC.U manages $55.71 M. DGR is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DGR and XUSC.U managed?
DGR is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XUSC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do DGR and XUSC.U emphasize?
DGR is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. XUSC.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DGR or XUSC.U?
Year to date, DGR has seen +$4.32 M in net flows, compared with +$5.73 M for XUSC.U. XUSC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DGR and XUSC.U compare?
DGR has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while XUSC.U has an expense ratio of 0.13%.
What are the top holdings of DGR and XUSC.U?
DGR's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. XUSC.U's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DGR or XUSC.U?
DGR holds 196 securities, while XUSC.U holds 500. On holdings count, XUSC.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about DGR and XUSC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.