VS
Compare CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR) vs BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. DGR provides Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials exposures, while ZSP.U is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, DGR features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP.U. Performance-wise, DGR has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas ZSP.U is at 11.36% with +$429 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DGR
ZSP.U
| AuM | $221.11 M | $4,178.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.55% | -0.30% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DGR | +1.19% | +0.52% | +10.86% | +12.15% | +52.97% |
ZSP.U | -2.60% | -1.96% | +11.36% | +11.46% | +79.03% | |
| Flows | DGR | -$8 M | -$8 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$105 M |
ZSP.U | +$12 M | +$53 M | +$429 M | +$298 M | -$176 M |
DGR vs ZSP.U exposure
Countries
DGR
USA
100.17%
ZSP.U
USA
97.60%
Sectors
DGR
Technology
42.26%
Healthcare
12.92%
Industrials
9.69%
Finance
7.17%
Other
27.95%
ZSP.U
Technology
47.39%
Finance
12.79%
Healthcare
9.20%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.63%
Industrials
7.38%
Other
14.62%
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DGR
NVIDIA Corp.
8.95%
Microsoft Corp.
7.79%
Apple, Inc.
4.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.76%
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.03%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.54%
Johnson & Johnson
2.39%
The Home Depot, Inc.
2.23%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.20%
ZSP.U
NVIDIA Corp.
8.33%
Apple, Inc.
7.28%
Microsoft Corp.
5.73%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.67%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Broadcom Inc.
2.56%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.43%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.83%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.51%
Diversification
DGR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 197 total
39.48%
ZSP.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.83%
Characteristics
Compare
DGR
ZSP.U
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 Daily Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.09% | 0.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 12, 2016 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about DGR and ZSP.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DGR or ZSP.U?
As of November 3, 2026, DGR has returned 10.86% year to date, while ZSP.U has returned 11.36%. ZSP.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DGR or ZSP.U?
As of November 3, 2026, DGR manages $221.11 M in assets, while ZSP.U manages $4.18 B. ZSP.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DGR and ZSP.U managed?
DGR is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZSP.U is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 Daily Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do DGR and ZSP.U emphasize?
DGR is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Industrials. ZSP.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DGR or ZSP.U?
Year to date, DGR has seen +$4.32 M in net flows, compared with +$428.61 M for ZSP.U. ZSP.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DGR and ZSP.U compare?
DGR has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while ZSP.U has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of DGR and ZSP.U?
DGR's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZSP.U's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DGR or ZSP.U?
DGR holds 196 securities, while ZSP.U holds 499. On holdings count, ZSP.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about DGR and ZSP.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.