VS
When evaluating costs, DLR features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, DLR has returned 0.15% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 7.87% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DLR
XIC
| AuM | $335.35 M | $28,822.16 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.57% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | 3.18% | -0.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DLR | -1.88% | +0.06% | -0.15% | +1.25% | +8.83% |
XIC | +6.57% | +6.98% | +7.87% | +39.98% | +79.31% | |
| Flows | DLR | +$77 M | +$49 M | +$95 M | +$117 M | +$197 M |
XIC | +$1,151 M | +$4,154 M | +$5,138 M | +$7,659 M | +$11,101 M |
DLR vs XIC exposure
Countries
DLR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
98.95%
Sectors
DLR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
28.13%
Energy
18.01%
Materials
15.92%
Other
13.03%
Other
24.92%
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DLR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.69%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.31%
ENBRIDGE
3.50%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.01%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.01%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
CA11271J1075
2.65%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.61%
BNS
2.53%
Diversification
DLR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
35.80%
Characteristics
Compare
DLR
XIC
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg USDCAD Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Currencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.75% | 2.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 11, 2011 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about DLR and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DLR or XIC?
As of April 30, 2026, DLR has returned -0.15% year to date, while XIC has returned 7.87%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DLR or XIC?
As of April 30, 2026, DLR manages $335.35 M in assets, while XIC manages $28.82 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DLR and XIC managed?
DLR is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Bloomberg USDCAD Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DLR or XIC?
Year to date, DLR has seen +$95.04 M in net flows, compared with +$5,138.12 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DLR and XIC compare?
DLR has an expense ratio of 0.57%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about DLR and XIC
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.