VS
When evaluating costs, DRFG features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.35% for GDIV. Performance-wise, DRFG has returned 15.4% year-to-date with +$450 M in net flows, whereas GDIV is at 20.99% with +$80 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DRFG
GDIV
| AuM | $477.71 M | $100.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.58% | 0.37% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DRFG | -0.55% | -1.11% | +15.40% | +16.97% | +90.58% |
GDIV | +0.16% | -0.77% | +20.99% | +19.46% | +75.23% | |
| Flows | DRFG | +$0 M | +$445 M | +$450 M | +$450 M | +$449 M |
GDIV | +$6 M | +$21 M | +$80 M | +$84 M | +$78 M |
DRFG vs GDIV exposure
Countries
DRFG
USA
57.18%
Other
42.82%
GDIV
Other
100.00%
Sectors
DRFG
Technology
35.68%
Finance
21.85%
Non-Energy Materials
8.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.15%
Other
25.99%
GDIV
Other
100.00%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DRFG
Apple, Inc.
5.15%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.03%
Microsoft Corp.
2.48%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.94%
Lam Research Corp.
1.42%
Visa, Inc.
1.40%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.40%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.38%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.26%
GDIV
CA56503P1080
68.05%
CA56503T1003
24.06%
CA56502U1084
5.64%
CA56502Q1072
2.01%
Diversification
DRFG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 301 total
21.79%
GDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
99.76%
Characteristics
Compare
DRFG
GDIV
| Provider | Desjardins Investments | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | SciBeta Desjardins Global RI Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Multifactor Index NR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.82% | 1.47% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | March 7, 2019 | May 15, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about DRFG and GDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DRFG or GDIV?
As of November 11, 2026, DRFG has returned 15.40% year to date, while GDIV has returned 20.99%. GDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DRFG or GDIV?
As of November 11, 2026, DRFG manages $477.71 M in assets, while GDIV manages $100.49 M. DRFG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DRFG and GDIV managed?
DRFG is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the SciBeta Desjardins Global RI Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Multifactor Index NR - CAD benchmark. GDIV is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DRFG or GDIV?
Year to date, DRFG has seen +$449.59 M in net flows, compared with +$79.75 M for GDIV. DRFG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DRFG and GDIV compare?
DRFG has an expense ratio of 0.58%, while GDIV has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
Which ETF is more diversified: DRFG or GDIV?
DRFG holds 295 securities, while GDIV holds 1. On holdings count, DRFG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about DRFG and GDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.