VS
Compare Desjardins RI USA - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMU) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. DRMU and HULC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, DRMU features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, DRMU has returned 13.13% year-to-date with -$189 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 13.9% with +$195 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DRMU
HULC
| AuM | $95.35 M | $816.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DRMU | -1.33% | +2.70% | +13.13% | +17.21% | +77.09% |
HULC | -1.25% | +3.05% | +13.90% | +17.53% | +81.56% | |
| Flows | DRMU | -$237 M | -$237 M | -$189 M | -$193 M | -$150 M |
HULC | +$26 M | +$78 M | +$195 M | +$240 M | +$122 M |
DRMU vs HULC exposure
Countries
DRMU
USA
97.19%
HULC
USA
96.38%
Sectors
DRMU
Technology
44.53%
Finance
13.96%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.15%
Healthcare
9.14%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
15.39%
HULC
Technology
44.43%
Finance
13.58%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.20%
Healthcare
9.10%
Industrials
8.09%
Other
15.60%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DRMU
Apple, Inc.
7.68%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.05%
Microsoft Corp.
4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.03%
Broadcom Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.84%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.49%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.23%
Apple, Inc.
6.81%
Microsoft Corp.
5.25%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.19%
Broadcom Inc.
2.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.78%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.88%
Tesla, Inc.
1.60%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.50%
Diversification
DRMU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
36.29%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 496 total
37.05%
Characteristics
Compare
DRMU
HULC
| Provider | Desjardins Investments | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.17% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | September 27, 2019 | February 6, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about DRMU and HULC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DRMU or HULC?
As of September 11, 2026, DRMU has returned 13.13% year to date, while HULC has returned 13.90%. HULC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DRMU or HULC?
As of September 11, 2026, DRMU manages $95.35 M in assets, while HULC manages $816.20 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DRMU and HULC managed?
DRMU is actively managed by Desjardins Investments. It does not track an index. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do DRMU and HULC emphasize?
DRMU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DRMU or HULC?
Year to date, DRMU has seen -$188.77 M in net flows, compared with +$195.16 M for HULC. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DRMU and HULC compare?
DRMU has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of DRMU and HULC?
DRMU's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. HULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DRMU or HULC?
DRMU holds 502 securities, while HULC holds 493. On holdings count, DRMU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about DRMU and HULC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.