VS
When evaluating costs, DXCP features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, DXCP has returned 2.18% year-to-date with +$146 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 35.8% with -$518 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DXCP
HBNK
| AuM | $242.79 M | $747.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.70% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 13, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DXCP | +0.36% | +1.45% | +2.18% | +4.64% | - |
HBNK | +1.49% | +18.96% | +35.80% | +67.70% | +160.15% | |
| Flows | DXCP | +$16 M | +$48 M | +$146 M | +$201 M | - |
HBNK | -$53 M | -$74 M | -$518 M | -$871 M | -$76 M |
DXCP vs HBNK exposure
Countries
DXCP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.94%
Sectors
DXCP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of August 13, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DXCP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%
Diversification
DXCP
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
DXCP
HBNK
| Provider | Dynamic Funds | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.69% | 2.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 15, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about DXCP and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DXCP or HBNK?
As of August 13, 2026, DXCP has returned 2.18% year to date, while HBNK has returned 35.80%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DXCP or HBNK?
As of August 13, 2026, DXCP manages $242.79 M in assets, while HBNK manages $747.47 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DXCP and HBNK managed?
DXCP is actively managed by Dynamic Funds. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DXCP or HBNK?
Year to date, DXCP has seen +$146.08 M in net flows, compared with -$518.03 M for HBNK. DXCP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DXCP and HBNK compare?
DXCP has an expense ratio of 0.70%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about DXCP and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.