VS
When evaluating costs, DXUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, DXUS has returned 4.78% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 22.36% with -$413 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DXUS
HBNK
| AuM | $300.56 M | $774.55 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DXUS | -1.08% | +7.90% | +4.78% | +17.54% | - |
HBNK | +6.43% | +18.58% | +22.36% | +63.74% | - | |
| Flows | DXUS | -$3 M | -$13 M | -$3 M | +$6 M | - |
HBNK | +$35 M | -$196 M | -$413 M | -$665 M | - |
DXUS vs HBNK exposure
Countries
DXUS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
DXUS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DXUS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
DXUS
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
DXUS
HBNK
| Provider | Dynamic Funds | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.73% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 24, 2023 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about DXUS and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DXUS or HBNK?
As of June 10, 2026, DXUS has returned 4.78% year to date, while HBNK has returned 22.36%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DXUS or HBNK?
As of June 10, 2026, DXUS manages $300.56 M in assets, while HBNK manages $774.55 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DXUS and HBNK managed?
DXUS is actively managed by Dynamic Funds. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DXUS or HBNK?
Year to date, DXUS has seen -$2.54 M in net flows, compared with -$412.69 M for HBNK. DXUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DXUS and HBNK compare?
DXUS has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about DXUS and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.