VS
When evaluating costs, EACC features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.25% for JBND. Performance-wise, EACC has returned 12.4% year-to-date with +$47 M in net flows, whereas JBND is at 1.3% with +$238 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EACC
JBND
| AuM | $107.86 M | $322.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.63% | 0.25% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EACC | -0.93% | +4.55% | +12.40% | +20.09% | - |
JBND | +0.10% | -0.86% | -1.30% | - | - | |
| Flows | EACC | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$47 M | +$65 M | - |
JBND | -$0 M | +$65 M | +$238 M | - | - |
EACC vs JBND exposure
Countries
EACC
Other
100.00%
JBND
Other
50.51%
USA
44.02%
Sectors
EACC
Other
100.00%
JBND
Other
50.51%
Sovereign
32.18%
Finance
8.45%
Other
8.87%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EACC
CA37962B1031
100.44%
JBND
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2029, USD (AC-2029)
1.63%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2034, USD (E-2034)
1.49%
USA, Notes 4% 15feb2034, USD (B-2034)
1.43%
USA, Notes 1.875% 15feb2032, USD (B-2032)
1.40%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31may2033, USD (L-2033)
1.35%
USA, STRIPS 0% 15feb2036, USD (10957D)
1.16%
USA, Notes 4% 31jul2032, USD (N-2032)
0.92%
USA, Notes 4.125% 29feb2032, USD (H-2032)
0.92%
USA, STRIPS 0% 15feb2040, USD (10961D)
0.90%
USA, STRIPS 0% 15aug2037, USD (10774D)
0.86%
Diversification
EACC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.44%
JBND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,691 total
12.06%
Characteristics
Compare
EACC
JBND
| Provider | Global X | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.57% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2024 | September 24, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about EACC and JBND
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EACC or JBND?
As of September 3, 2026, EACC has returned 12.40% year to date, while JBND has returned -1.30%. EACC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EACC or JBND?
As of September 3, 2026, EACC manages $107.86 M in assets, while JBND manages $322.96 M. JBND is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EACC and JBND managed?
EACC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. JBND is actively managed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EACC or JBND?
Year to date, EACC has seen +$46.87 M in net flows, compared with +$238.01 M for JBND. JBND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EACC and JBND compare?
EACC has an expense ratio of 0.63%, while JBND has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
Which ETF is more diversified: EACC or JBND?
EACC holds 1 securities, while JBND holds 601. On holdings count, JBND is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about EACC and JBND
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.