EAFX
Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full EAFX fund page
VS
CIEH
CIBC MSCI EAFE Equity Index ETF

Full CIEH fund page

Compare Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF (EAFX) vs CIBC MSCI EAFE Equity Index ETF (CIEH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. EAFX and CIEH provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, EAFX features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.16% for CIEH. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EAFX
-2.03%+0.74%+9.09%+12.51%-
CIEH
-1.46%+0.80%+12.61%+15.32%+65.09%
Flows
EAFX
-----
CIEH
-$0 M-$0 M-$11 M+$2 M+$3 M

EAFX vs CIEH exposure

Countries

EAFX
Japan
23.74%
United Kingdom
13.75%
Switzerland
9.84%
Germany
8.75%
France
8.69%
Other
35.23%
CIEH
Japan
22.82%
United Kingdom
13.15%
Switzerland
9.39%
Germany
8.35%
France
8.29%
Other
38.00%

Sectors

EAFX
Finance
27.68%
Industrials
15.81%
Technology
12.97%
Healthcare
9.69%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.95%
Non-Energy Materials
7.03%
Other
18.88%
CIEH
Finance
26.49%
Industrials
15.17%
Technology
12.41%
Healthcare
9.25%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.60%
Other
29.08%
As of October 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EAFX
ASML Holding NV
2.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.59%
Roche Holding AG
1.37%
Novartis AG
1.25%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.10%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.08%
Siemens AG
1.07%
CIEH
ASML Holding NV
2.79%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.52%
Roche Holding AG
1.31%
Novartis AG
1.19%
Shell Plc
1.07%
Nestlé SA
1.07%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.05%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.04%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.03%
Siemens AG
1.02%

Diversification

EAFX
Exposure data will be available soon
CIEH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,627 total
13.08%

Characteristics

Compare
EAFX
CIEH
ProviderGlobal XCIBC
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USDMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.67%7.71%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 15, 2024January 23, 2023

Frequently asked questions about EAFX and CIEH

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EAFX or CIEH?
As of October 19, 2026, EAFX has returned 9.09% year to date, while CIEH has returned 12.61%. CIEH is ahead on YTD performance.
How are EAFX and CIEH managed?
EAFX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark. CIEH is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do EAFX and CIEH emphasize?
EAFX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. CIEH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
How do the fees of EAFX and CIEH compare?
EAFX has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while CIEH has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of EAFX and CIEH?
EAFX's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. CIEH's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EAFX or CIEH?
EAFX holds 650 securities, while CIEH holds 2608. On holdings count, CIEH is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds