EAFX
Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full EAFX fund page
VS
XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page

Compare Global X MSCI EAFE Index ETF (EAFX) vs iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. EAFX and XIN provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, EAFX features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.5% for XIN. Performance-wise, EAFX has returned 9.09% year-to-date with +$59 M in net flows, whereas XIN is at 11.6% with +$127 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EAFX
-2.03%+0.74%+9.09%+12.51%-
XIN
+0.29%+0.05%+11.60%+15.72%+58.53%
Flows
EAFX
+$6 M+$11 M+$59 M+$75 M+$0 M
XIN
-$6 M-$2 M+$127 M+$139 M+$88 M

EAFX vs XIN exposure

Countries

EAFX
Japan
23.74%
United Kingdom
13.75%
Switzerland
9.84%
Germany
8.75%
France
8.69%
Other
35.23%
XIN
Japan
23.72%
United Kingdom
13.73%
Switzerland
9.83%
Germany
8.74%
France
8.69%
Other
35.29%

Sectors

EAFX
Finance
27.68%
Industrials
15.81%
Technology
12.97%
Healthcare
9.69%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.95%
Non-Energy Materials
7.03%
Other
18.88%
XIN
Finance
27.65%
Industrials
15.79%
Technology
12.96%
Healthcare
9.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.94%
Non-Energy Materials
7.02%
Other
18.95%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EAFX
ASML Holding NV
2.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.59%
Roche Holding AG
1.37%
Novartis AG
1.25%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.10%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.08%
Siemens AG
1.07%
XIN
ASML Holding NV
2.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.59%
Roche Holding AG
1.37%
Novartis AG
1.25%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.10%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.08%
Siemens AG
1.07%

Diversification

EAFX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
13.76%
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
13.74%

Characteristics

Compare
EAFX
XIN
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USDMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Other
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.67%2.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 15, 2024September 6, 2011

Frequently asked questions about EAFX and XIN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EAFX or XIN?
As of October 16, 2026, EAFX has returned 9.09% year to date, while XIN has returned 11.60%. XIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EAFX or XIN?
As of October 16, 2026, EAFX manages $263.92 M in assets, while XIN manages $1.91 B. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EAFX and XIN managed?
EAFX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do EAFX and XIN emphasize?
EAFX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EAFX or XIN?
Year to date, EAFX has seen +$59.28 M in net flows, compared with +$127.41 M for XIN. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EAFX and XIN compare?
EAFX has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What are the top holdings of EAFX and XIN?
EAFX's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. XIN's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: EAFX or XIN?
EAFX holds 650 securities, while XIN holds 650. On holdings count, EAFX is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds