When evaluating costs, EASY features a management fee (MER) of 0%, compared to 0.65% for ZPW. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EASY
ZPW
| AuM | $106.96 M | $107.19 M |
| Management Fees | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EASY | +3.29% | +2.82% | - | - | - |
ZPW | -0.58% | +5.22% | +7.96% | +12.67% | +36.05% | |
| Flows | EASY | +$13 M | +$48 M | - | - | - |
ZPW | +$2 M | +$0 M | +$19 M | +$29 M | +$43 M |
EASY vs ZPW exposure
Countries
EASY
Other
100.00%
ZPW
Other
100.00%
Sectors
EASY
Other
100.00%
ZPW
Other
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EASY
CA30054D1033
43.91%
CA30055K1066
29.77%
CA30053U3047
24.79%
ZPW
CA05581B1013
96.40%
Diversification
EASY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3 total
98.47%
ZPW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
96.40%
Characteristics
Compare
EASY
ZPW
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 9.44% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 11, 2026 | September 2, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about EASY and ZPW
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EASY or ZPW?
As of September 3, 2026, EASY manages $106.96 M in assets, while ZPW manages $107.19 M. ZPW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EASY and ZPW managed?
EASY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
How do the fees of EASY and ZPW compare?
EASY has an expense ratio of 0.00%, while ZPW has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
Which ETF is more diversified: EASY or ZPW?
EASY holds 1 securities, while ZPW holds 1. On holdings count, EASY is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.