EMMX
Global X MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF

Full EMMX fund page
VS
ZEM
BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF

Full ZEM fund page

Compare Global X MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (EMMX) vs BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. EMMX and ZEM provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, EMMX features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.25% for ZEM. Performance-wise, EMMX has returned 13.75% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas ZEM is at 18.8% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-12.0-10.0-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EMMX
-5.05%-4.92%+13.75%+14.00%-
ZEM
-4.49%-2.08%+18.80%+16.23%+79.69%
Flows
EMMX
+$28 M+$25 M-$3 M+$5 M+$0 M
ZEM
+$371 M+$583 M+$1,394 M+$1,649 M+$1,714 M

EMMX vs ZEM exposure

Countries

EMMX
Taiwan
28.84%
Republic of Korea
21.32%
China
17.71%
India
10.61%
Other
21.53%
ZEM
Taiwan
28.84%
Republic of Korea
21.32%
China
17.71%
India
10.61%
Other
21.53%

Sectors

EMMX
Technology
46.62%
Finance
21.05%
Other
32.33%
ZEM
Technology
46.62%
Finance
21.05%
Other
32.33%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EMMX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.57%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
7.53%
SK hynix, Inc.
5.88%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.73%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.85%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.81%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.94%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.94%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.85%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.79%
ZEM
US4642872349
100.00%

Diversification

EMMX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,169 total
38.89%
ZEM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,169 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
EMMX
ZEM
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - USDMSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.95%1.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 15, 2024October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about EMMX and ZEM

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EMMX or ZEM?
As of November 11, 2026, EMMX has returned 13.75% year to date, while ZEM has returned 18.80%. ZEM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EMMX or ZEM?
As of November 11, 2026, EMMX manages $166.54 M in assets, while ZEM manages $3.91 B. ZEM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EMMX and ZEM managed?
EMMX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZEM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: EMMX or ZEM?
EMMX holds 1111 securities, while ZEM holds 1. On holdings count, EMMX is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EMMX or ZEM?
Year to date, EMMX has seen -$2.98 M in net flows, compared with +$1,393.65 M for ZEM. ZEM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EMMX and ZEM compare?
EMMX has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZEM has an expense ratio of 0.27%.
What sectors do EMMX and ZEM emphasize?
EMMX is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials. ZEM is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials.

Recent articles about EMMX and ZEM

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds