VS
When evaluating costs, ENBY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, ENBY has returned 8.39% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 30.27% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ENBY
HEWB
| AuM | $4.90 M | $343.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ENBY | -6.89% | -10.50% | +8.39% | +6.44% | - |
HEWB | -1.83% | +8.84% | +30.27% | +54.40% | +156.87% | |
| Flows | ENBY | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | - |
HEWB | +$0 M | +$15 M | +$27 M | +$26 M | +$33 M |
ENBY vs HEWB exposure
Countries
ENBY
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
ENBY
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ENBY
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
ENBY
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
ENBY
HEWB
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.98% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 21, 2025 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ENBY and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ENBY or HEWB?
As of September 2, 2026, ENBY has returned 8.39% year to date, while HEWB has returned 30.27%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ENBY or HEWB?
As of September 2, 2026, ENBY manages $4.90 M in assets, while HEWB manages $343.43 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ENBY and HEWB managed?
ENBY is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ENBY or HEWB?
Year to date, ENBY has seen +$1.77 M in net flows, compared with +$26.91 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ENBY and HEWB compare?
ENBY has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about ENBY and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.