EQY
Franklin All-Equity ETF Portfolio

Full EQY fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, EQY features a management fee (MER) of 0.13%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, EQY has returned 7.66% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 16.24% with -$65 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11May 19

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EQY
+1.72%+4.12%+7.66%+24.80%-
ZUT
+1.19%+6.84%+16.24%+27.49%+39.99%
Flows
EQY
+$0 M+$0 M+$1 M+$3 M-
ZUT
-$4 M-$5 M-$65 M+$130 M+$245 M

EQY vs ZUT exposure

Countries

EQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

EQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

EQY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
EQY
ZUT
ProviderFranklin TempletonBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.83%2.89%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 5, 2024January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about EQY and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EQY or ZUT?
As of May 19, 2026, EQY has returned 7.66% year to date, while ZUT has returned 16.24%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EQY or ZUT?
As of May 19, 2026, EQY manages $4.23 M in assets, while ZUT manages $875.56 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EQY and ZUT managed?
EQY is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EQY or ZUT?
Year to date, EQY has seen +$1.34 M in net flows, compared with -$64.50 M for ZUT. EQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EQY and ZUT compare?
EQY has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about EQY and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds