VS
Compare BMO MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGY.F) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ESGY.F provides Technology, Finance, and Healthcare exposures, while HULC is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ESGY.F features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, ESGY.F has returned 8.98% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 13.36% with +$198 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ESGY.F
HULC
| AuM | $5.64 M | $815.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.20% | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ESGY.F | -3.14% | +0.36% | +8.98% | +14.71% | +66.12% |
HULC | -1.67% | +0.65% | +13.36% | +17.27% | +83.34% | |
| Flows | ESGY.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$2 M | +$0 M | -$3 M |
HULC | +$26 M | +$75 M | +$198 M | +$243 M | +$124 M |
ESGY.F vs HULC exposure
Countries
ESGY.F
USA
96.33%
HULC
USA
96.38%
Sectors
ESGY.F
Technology
45.58%
Finance
13.21%
Healthcare
10.57%
Industrials
8.27%
Other
22.37%
HULC
Technology
44.43%
Finance
13.58%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.20%
Healthcare
9.10%
Industrials
8.09%
Other
15.60%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ESGY.F
NVIDIA Corp.
13.44%
Microsoft Corp.
9.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.61%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.77%
Tesla, Inc.
2.60%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.36%
Johnson & Johnson
1.84%
Visa, Inc.
1.84%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.41%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.23%
Apple, Inc.
6.81%
Microsoft Corp.
5.25%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.19%
Broadcom Inc.
2.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.78%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.88%
Tesla, Inc.
1.60%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.50%
Diversification
ESGY.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 262 total
46.16%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 496 total
37.05%
Characteristics
Compare
ESGY.F
HULC
| Provider | BMO | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.66% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 12, 2021 | February 6, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about ESGY.F and HULC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ESGY.F or HULC?
As of September 16, 2026, ESGY.F has returned 8.98% year to date, while HULC has returned 13.36%. HULC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ESGY.F or HULC?
As of September 16, 2026, ESGY.F manages $5.64 M in assets, while HULC manages $815.60 M. HULC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ESGY.F and HULC managed?
ESGY.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ESGY.F and HULC emphasize?
ESGY.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ESGY.F or HULC?
Year to date, ESGY.F has seen -$2.40 M in net flows, compared with +$198.41 M for HULC. HULC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ESGY.F and HULC compare?
ESGY.F has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of ESGY.F and HULC?
ESGY.F's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. HULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ESGY.F or HULC?
ESGY.F holds 260 securities, while HULC holds 493. On holdings count, HULC is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.