VS
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF (ETHI) and AGF Systematic Global ESG Factors ETF (QEF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ETHI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while QEF leans towards Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ETHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.45% for QEF. Performance-wise, ETHI has returned 11.25% year-to-date with -$9 M in net flows, whereas QEF is at 12.64% with -$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ETHI
QEF
| AuM | $101.16 M | $115.62 M |
| Management Fees | 0.64% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ETHI | +1.05% | +6.52% | +11.25% | +15.51% | +48.45% |
QEF | -1.54% | +1.31% | +12.64% | +20.74% | +64.19% | |
| Flows | ETHI | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$9 M | -$16 M | -$27 M |
QEF | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$6 M | -$12 M | -$44 M |
ETHI vs QEF exposure
Countries
ETHI
USA
68.35%
Japan
9.65%
Other
22.00%
QEF
USA
60.36%
Other
39.64%
Sectors
ETHI
Technology
34.04%
Finance
32.16%
Healthcare
11.78%
Consumer Cyclicals
10.07%
Other
11.95%
QEF
Technology
35.08%
Finance
23.57%
Industrials
8.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.62%
Healthcare
7.35%
Other
18.05%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ETHI
Broadcom Inc.
4.33%
Apple, Inc.
4.19%
Visa, Inc.
4.17%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.96%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.88%
ASML Holding NV
3.47%
The Home Depot, Inc.
3.05%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.04%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.51%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.99%
QEF
Apple, Inc.
5.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.32%
Microsoft Corp.
3.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.65%
Broadcom Inc.
2.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.18%
Allianz SE
1.62%
Rio Tinto Plc
1.60%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.53%
Diversification
ETHI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 196 total
34.59%
QEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 129 total
28.62%
Characteristics
Compare
ETHI
QEF
| Provider | Global X | AGF |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders USD TR Index- USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.78% | 1.14% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | Yes |
| Inception Date | October 31, 2018 | February 12, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about ETHI and QEF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ETHI or QEF?
As of September 3, 2026, ETHI has returned 11.25% year to date, while QEF has returned 12.64%. QEF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ETHI or QEF?
As of September 3, 2026, ETHI manages $101.16 M in assets, while QEF manages $115.62 M. QEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ETHI and QEF managed?
ETHI is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders USD TR Index- USD benchmark. QEF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ETHI and QEF emphasize?
ETHI is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. QEF is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ETHI or QEF?
Year to date, ETHI has seen -$8.72 M in net flows, compared with -$5.71 M for QEF. QEF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ETHI and QEF compare?
ETHI has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while QEF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of ETHI and QEF?
ETHI's largest holdings include Broadcom Inc., Apple, Inc., and Visa, Inc.. QEF's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ETHI or QEF?
ETHI holds 196 securities, while QEF holds 127. On holdings count, ETHI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.