FBT
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF

Full FBT fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF (FBT) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FBT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Health Care, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, FBT features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, FBT has returned 2.75% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 15.52% with -$1,017 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.0%Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4May 11

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FBT
+3.46%+4.39%+2.75%+30.56%+37.72%
ZEB
+4.94%+12.72%+15.52%+63.06%+122.25%
Flows
FBT
+$0 M+$2 M+$2 M+$2 M+$1 M
ZEB
-$97 M-$405 M-$1,017 M-$1,400 M-$1,455 M

FBT vs ZEB exposure

Countries

FBT
USA
95.76%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

FBT
Health Care
90.59%
Other
9.41%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FBT
MODERNA INC
5.14%
ALKERMES
4.16%
UTD THERAPEUT
4.15%
GILEAD SCIENCES
4.08%
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS
3.94%
AXSOME THERA CMN STK
3.91%
AMGEN-T
3.81%
EXELIXIS
3.52%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC
3.49%
BIOGEN INC
3.45%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%

Diversification

FBT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
39.65%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
FBT
ZEB
ProviderFirst TrustBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkNYSE Arca Biotechnology Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.61%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 30, 2014October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about FBT and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FBT or ZEB?
As of May 12, 2026, FBT has returned 2.75% year to date, while ZEB has returned 15.52%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FBT or ZEB?
As of May 12, 2026, FBT manages $4.03 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.27 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FBT and ZEB managed?
FBT is passively managed by First Trust. It tracks the NYSE Arca Biotechnology Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FBT and ZEB emphasize?
FBT is most exposed to Health Care. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FBT or ZEB?
Year to date, FBT has seen +$2.12 M in net flows, compared with -$1,017.47 M for ZEB. FBT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FBT and ZEB compare?
FBT has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of FBT and ZEB?
FBT's largest holdings include MODERNA INC and ALKERMES. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FBT or ZEB?
FBT holds 28 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, FBT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about FBT and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds