VS
Fidelity All-American Equity ETF (FCAM) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FCAM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials, while CUSM.B leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, FCAM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, FCAM has returned 11.77% year-to-date with +$50 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 11.06% with +$38 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCAM
CUSM.B
| AuM | $307.66 M | $225.64 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCAM | +2.71% | +12.92% | +11.77% | +23.57% | - |
CUSM.B | +2.81% | +14.50% | +11.06% | +27.27% | +84.49% | |
| Flows | FCAM | +$10 M | +$34 M | +$50 M | +$115 M | - |
CUSM.B | +$11 M | +$14 M | +$38 M | +$61 M | +$141 M |
FCAM vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
FCAM
USA
92.99%
Other
7.01%
CUSM.B
USA
96.47%
Sectors
FCAM
Information Technology
31.42%
Industrials
12.72%
Financials
11.23%
Health Care
9.20%
Other
35.42%
CUSM.B
Information Technology
33.91%
Communication Services
10.76%
Consumer Discretionary
10.17%
Financials
9.73%
Industrials
8.81%
Health Care
8.61%
Other
18.00%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCAM
APPLE
5.68%
MICROSOFT-T
4.99%
NVIDIA
4.79%
NEWMONT CORP
2.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.42%
ALCOA CORP
1.59%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.48%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.36%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.36%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA
7.02%
APPLE
5.89%
MICROSOFT-T
4.51%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.37%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.93%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.90%
META PLATFORMS
2.00%
TESLA
1.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.28%
Diversification
FCAM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
29.23%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,005 total
35.38%
Characteristics
Compare
FCAM
CUSM.B
| Provider | Fidelity | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.73% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2024 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FCAM and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCAM or CUSM.B?
As of June 12, 2026, FCAM has returned 11.77% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 11.06%. FCAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCAM or CUSM.B?
As of June 12, 2026, FCAM manages $307.66 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $225.64 M. FCAM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCAM and CUSM.B managed?
FCAM is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do FCAM and CUSM.B emphasize?
FCAM is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. CUSM.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCAM or CUSM.B?
Year to date, FCAM has seen +$49.86 M in net flows, compared with +$37.70 M for CUSM.B. FCAM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCAM and CUSM.B compare?
FCAM has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of FCAM and CUSM.B?
FCAM's largest holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T, and NVIDIA. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCAM or CUSM.B?
FCAM holds 219 securities, while CUSM.B holds 905. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCAM and CUSM.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.