VS
When evaluating costs, FCAM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, FCAM has returned 16.57% year-to-date with +$85 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 29.16% with +$29 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCAM
HEWB
| AuM | $356.00 M | $342.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.70% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCAM | +2.20% | +2.54% | +16.57% | +16.63% | - |
HEWB | -0.39% | -5.12% | +29.16% | +44.88% | +164.41% | |
| Flows | FCAM | +$7 M | +$21 M | +$85 M | +$107 M | - |
HEWB | -$3 M | +$6 M | +$29 M | +$28 M | +$35 M |
FCAM vs HEWB exposure
Countries
FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
FCAM
HEWB
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2024 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCAM and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCAM or HEWB?
As of October 16, 2026, FCAM has returned 16.57% year to date, while HEWB has returned 29.16%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCAM or HEWB?
As of October 16, 2026, FCAM manages $356.00 M in assets, while HEWB manages $342.43 M. FCAM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCAM and HEWB managed?
FCAM is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCAM or HEWB?
Year to date, FCAM has seen +$84.57 M in net flows, compared with +$28.98 M for HEWB. FCAM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCAM and HEWB compare?
FCAM has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about FCAM and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.