FCAM
Fidelity All-American Equity ETF

Full FCAM fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, FCAM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FCAM has returned 16.57% year-to-date with +$85 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FCAM
+2.20%+2.54%+16.57%+16.63%-
XIC
+2.09%+2.88%+16.00%+21.37%+99.54%
Flows
FCAM
+$7 M+$21 M+$85 M+$107 M-
XIC
+$2,625 M+$4,767 M+$11,229 M+$12,392 M+$17,393 M

FCAM vs XIC exposure

Countries

FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.58%

Sectors

FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%

Diversification

FCAM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%

Characteristics

Compare
FCAM
XIC
ProviderFidelityiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%1.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2024February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about FCAM and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCAM or XIC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCAM has returned 16.57% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.00%. FCAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCAM or XIC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCAM manages $356.00 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.84 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCAM and XIC managed?
FCAM is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCAM or XIC?
Year to date, FCAM has seen +$84.57 M in net flows, compared with +$11,229.32 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCAM and XIC compare?
FCAM has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about FCAM and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds