VS
Fidelity All-American Equity ETF (FCAM) and iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XSPC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FCAM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials, while XSPC leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, FCAM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.12% for XSPC. Performance-wise, FCAM has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$49 M in net flows, whereas XSPC is at 8.3% with -$63 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCAM
XSPC
| AuM | $304.68 M | $327.81 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.12% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.14% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 0.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCAM | +1.49% | +11.10% | +10.86% | +22.55% | - |
XSPC | +0.82% | +8.46% | +8.30% | +20.65% | - | |
| Flows | FCAM | +$10 M | +$38 M | +$49 M | +$115 M | - |
XSPC | -$87 M | -$114 M | -$63 M | +$78 M | - |
FCAM vs XSPC exposure
Countries
FCAM
USA
92.99%
Other
7.01%
XSPC
USA
96.31%
Sectors
FCAM
Information Technology
31.42%
Industrials
12.72%
Financials
11.23%
Health Care
9.20%
Other
35.42%
XSPC
Information Technology
28.32%
Financials
11.92%
Consumer Discretionary
10.67%
Health Care
10.09%
Industrials
9.73%
Communication Services
8.89%
Other
20.37%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCAM
APPLE
5.68%
MICROSOFT-T
4.99%
NVIDIA
4.79%
NEWMONT CORP
2.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.42%
ALCOA CORP
1.59%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.48%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.36%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.36%
XSPC
AMAZON.COM INC
3.53%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.46%
NVIDIA
3.04%
APPLE
2.95%
MICROSOFT-T
2.85%
META PLATFORMS
2.61%
TESLA
2.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.96%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.69%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.65%
Diversification
FCAM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
29.23%
XSPC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.84%
Characteristics
Compare
FCAM
XSPC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2024 | July 9, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about FCAM and XSPC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCAM or XSPC?
As of June 11, 2026, FCAM has returned 10.86% year to date, while XSPC has returned 8.30%. FCAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCAM or XSPC?
As of June 11, 2026, FCAM manages $304.68 M in assets, while XSPC manages $327.81 M. XSPC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCAM and XSPC managed?
FCAM is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XSPC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do FCAM and XSPC emphasize?
FCAM is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. XSPC is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCAM or XSPC?
Year to date, FCAM has seen +$49.37 M in net flows, compared with -$62.60 M for XSPC. FCAM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCAM and XSPC compare?
FCAM has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XSPC has an expense ratio of 0.14%.
What are the top holdings of FCAM and XSPC?
FCAM's largest holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T, and NVIDIA. XSPC's top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, ALPHABET INC-CL, and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCAM or XSPC?
FCAM holds 219 securities, while XSPC holds 478. On holdings count, XSPC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCAM and XSPC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.