FCCA
Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF

Full FCCA fund page
VS
CYLD
Manulife Smart Enhanced Yield ETF

Full CYLD fund page

Fidelity All-Canadian Equity ETF (FCCA) and Manulife Smart Enhanced Yield ETF (CYLD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FCCA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Materials, and Energy, while CYLD leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, FCCA features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.52% for CYLD. Performance-wise, FCCA has returned 10.07% year-to-date with +$100 M in net flows, whereas CYLD is at 9.63% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FCCA
+0.57%+4.26%+10.07%+34.35%-
CYLD
+0.79%+3.50%+9.63%+23.98%-
Flows
FCCA
+$9 M+$26 M+$100 M+$125 M-
CYLD
-$0 M-$2 M-$2 M-$8 M-

FCCA vs CYLD exposure

Countries

FCCA
Canada
95.67%
CYLD
Canada
76.60%
Other
23.40%

Sectors

FCCA
Financials
28.56%
Materials
19.62%
Energy
10.83%
Other
7.06%
Other
33.93%
CYLD
Other
27.31%
Financials
20.58%
Energy
15.15%
Materials
13.28%
Other
23.68%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FCCA
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.42%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.39%
BARRICK GOLD
3.85%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.56%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
2.80%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.60%
ENBRIDGE
2.60%
BNS
2.58%
LOBLAW COMPANIES
2.34%
KINROSS GOLD
2.23%
CYLD
TORONTO DOMINION
3.40%
BARRICK GOLD
3.34%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.12%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.08%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.07%
CDN NATL RAILWAY
2.95%
BNS
2.86%
NUTRIEN LTD
2.83%
FORTIS
2.63%
SUN LIFE FINL
2.60%

Diversification

FCCA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 107 total
33.36%
CYLD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 53 total
29.88%

Characteristics

Compare
FCCA
CYLD
ProviderFidelityManulife Investments
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%5.52%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2024June 4, 2024

Frequently asked questions about FCCA and CYLD

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCA or CYLD?
As of June 11, 2026, FCCA has returned 10.07% year to date, while CYLD has returned 9.63%. FCCA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCA or CYLD?
As of June 11, 2026, FCCA manages $200.37 M in assets, while CYLD manages $38.25 M. FCCA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCA and CYLD managed?
FCCA is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. CYLD is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FCCA and CYLD emphasize?
FCCA is most exposed to Financials, Materials, and Energy. CYLD is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCA or CYLD?
Year to date, FCCA has seen +$99.53 M in net flows, compared with -$1.63 M for CYLD. FCCA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCA and CYLD compare?
FCCA has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while CYLD has an expense ratio of 0.57%.
What are the top holdings of FCCA and CYLD?
FCCA's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BARRICK GOLD. CYLD's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION and BARRICK GOLD.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCCA or CYLD?
FCCA holds 105 securities, while CYLD holds 52. On holdings count, FCCA is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about FCCA and CYLD

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds