VS
When evaluating costs, FCCM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FCCM has returned 14.2% year-to-date with +$394 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 13.46% with -$98 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCM
ZUT
| AuM | $1,314.21 M | $816.24 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.35% | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCM | -0.97% | +2.50% | +14.20% | +30.94% | +113.62% |
ZUT | -4.33% | -5.42% | +13.46% | +19.30% | +47.99% | |
| Flows | FCCM | +$32 M | +$116 M | +$394 M | +$544 M | +$951 M |
ZUT | +$14 M | -$32 M | -$98 M | -$105 M | +$220 M |
FCCM vs ZUT exposure
Countries
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%
Sectors
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%
Diversification
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCM
ZUT
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.82% | 2.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCM and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCM or ZUT?
As of September 17, 2026, FCCM has returned 14.20% year to date, while ZUT has returned 13.46%. FCCM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCM or ZUT?
As of September 17, 2026, FCCM manages $1.31 B in assets, while ZUT manages $816.24 M. FCCM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCM and ZUT managed?
FCCM is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCM or ZUT?
Year to date, FCCM has seen +$394.05 M in net flows, compared with -$97.69 M for ZUT. FCCM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCM and ZUT compare?
FCCM has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about FCCM and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.