VS
When evaluating costs, FCCQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FCCQ has returned 13.22% year-to-date with +$356 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCQ
XIC
| AuM | $1,197.20 M | $36,835.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.40% | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCQ | +3.17% | +6.01% | +13.22% | +19.78% | +91.20% |
XIC | +2.09% | +2.88% | +16.00% | +21.37% | +99.54% | |
| Flows | FCCQ | +$58 M | +$121 M | +$356 M | +$463 M | +$885 M |
XIC | +$2,625 M | +$4,767 M | +$11,229 M | +$12,392 M | +$17,393 M |
FCCQ vs XIC exposure
Countries
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.58%
Sectors
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%
Diversification
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCQ
XIC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.41% | 1.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCQ and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCQ or XIC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCCQ has returned 13.22% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.00%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCQ or XIC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCCQ manages $1.20 B in assets, while XIC manages $36.84 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCQ and XIC managed?
FCCQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCQ or XIC?
Year to date, FCCQ has seen +$356.07 M in net flows, compared with +$11,229.32 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCQ and XIC compare?
FCCQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCCQ and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.