VS
When evaluating costs, FCGB features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FCGB has returned 0.47% year-to-date with +$168 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 8.22% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGB
XIC
| AuM | $1,603.39 M | $28,393.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.56% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGB | +0.27% | -0.09% | +0.47% | +3.39% | +5.01% |
XIC | +3.95% | +4.19% | +8.22% | +46.33% | +80.41% | |
| Flows | FCGB | +$24 M | +$151 M | +$168 M | +$397 M | +$869 M |
XIC | +$1,633 M | +$4,194 M | +$4,619 M | +$7,108 M | +$10,489 M |
FCGB vs XIC exposure
Countries
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
27.79%
Materials
18.28%
Energy
16.04%
Other
13.24%
Other
24.66%
As of April 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.50%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.58%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.09%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.50%
ENBRIDGE
3.21%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.84%
CA11271J1075
2.63%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.60%
BNS
2.60%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.53%
Diversification
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
35.08%
Characteristics
Compare
FCGB
XIC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.21% | 2.07% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 25, 2019 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGB and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGB or XIC?
As of April 14, 2026, FCGB has returned 0.47% year to date, while XIC has returned 8.22%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGB or XIC?
As of April 14, 2026, FCGB manages $1.60 B in assets, while XIC manages $28.39 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGB and XIC managed?
FCGB is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGB or XIC?
Year to date, FCGB has seen +$167.66 M in net flows, compared with +$4,618.64 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGB and XIC compare?
FCGB has an expense ratio of 0.56%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCGB and XIC
Fidelity Investments Canada welcomes 12 ETFs to Cboe Canada
Fidelity Investments Canada increases their ETF offerings on Cboe Canada.
Posted on 4/12/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.