VS
When evaluating costs, FCGB features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, FCGB has returned 2.18% year-to-date with +$224 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 30.13% with +$531 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGB
ZEB
| AuM | $1,591.30 M | $7,406.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.56% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGB | -1.11% | -2.41% | -2.18% | -2.95% | +4.07% |
ZEB | -2.08% | +5.04% | +30.13% | +49.59% | +159.17% | |
| Flows | FCGB | +$18 M | +$34 M | +$224 M | +$362 M | +$842 M |
ZEB | +$277 M | +$1,632 M | +$531 M | +$1,038 M | -$434 M |
FCGB vs ZEB exposure
Countries
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
FCGB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
FCGB
ZEB
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.83% | 2.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 25, 2019 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGB and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGB or ZEB?
As of September 11, 2026, FCGB has returned -2.18% year to date, while ZEB has returned 30.13%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGB or ZEB?
As of September 11, 2026, FCGB manages $1.59 B in assets, while ZEB manages $7.41 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGB and ZEB managed?
FCGB is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGB or ZEB?
Year to date, FCGB has seen +$224.00 M in net flows, compared with +$530.61 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGB and ZEB compare?
FCGB has an expense ratio of 0.56%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about FCGB and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.