VS
When evaluating costs, FCGC features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FCGC has returned 16.64% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 17.65% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGC
XIC
| AuM | $115.72 M | $34,993.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.10% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGC | +2.98% | +6.12% | +16.64% | +23.47% | +59.98% |
XIC | +3.64% | +6.82% | +17.65% | +32.83% | +99.41% | |
| Flows | FCGC | +$1 M | +$3 M | +$11 M | +$12 M | +$41 M |
XIC | +$2,035 M | +$3,367 M | +$8,756 M | +$9,870 M | +$14,801 M |
FCGC vs XIC exposure
Countries
FCGC
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.21%
Sectors
FCGC
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.50%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.44%
As of August 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGC
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%
Diversification
FCGC
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%
Characteristics
Compare
FCGC
XIC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.91% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 25, 2023 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGC and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGC or XIC?
As of August 26, 2026, FCGC has returned 16.64% year to date, while XIC has returned 17.65%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGC or XIC?
As of August 26, 2026, FCGC manages $115.72 M in assets, while XIC manages $34.99 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGC and XIC managed?
FCGC is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGC or XIC?
Year to date, FCGC has seen +$11.41 M in net flows, compared with +$8,756.10 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGC and XIC compare?
FCGC has an expense ratio of 1.10%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCGC and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




