VS
When evaluating costs, FCGS features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.35% for FCCQ. Performance-wise, FCGS has returned 9.35% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas FCCQ is at 13.22% with +$356 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGS
FCCQ
| AuM | $1,250.46 M | $1,197.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.11% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.40% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGS | +2.08% | -1.38% | +9.35% | +9.74% | +63.67% |
FCCQ | +3.17% | +6.01% | +13.22% | +19.78% | +91.20% | |
| Flows | FCGS | -$11 M | -$2 M | +$95 M | +$85 M | +$1,010 M |
FCCQ | +$58 M | +$121 M | +$356 M | +$463 M | +$885 M |
FCGS vs FCCQ exposure
Countries
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCGS
FCCQ
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 25, 2023 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGS and FCCQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGS or FCCQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS has returned 9.35% year to date, while FCCQ has returned 13.22%. FCCQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGS or FCCQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS manages $1.25 B in assets, while FCCQ manages $1.20 B. FCGS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGS and FCCQ managed?
FCGS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. FCCQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGS or FCCQ?
Year to date, FCGS has seen +$94.87 M in net flows, compared with +$356.07 M for FCCQ. FCCQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGS and FCCQ compare?
FCGS has an expense ratio of 1.11%, while FCCQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about FCGS and FCCQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.