VS
When evaluating costs, FCGS features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.35% for FCUQ. Performance-wise, FCGS has returned 9.35% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas FCUQ is at 13.85% with +$733 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGS
FCUQ
| AuM | $1,250.46 M | $2,817.37 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.11% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.61% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGS | +2.08% | -1.38% | +9.35% | +9.74% | +63.67% |
FCUQ | +2.93% | +3.79% | +13.85% | +13.48% | +66.83% | |
| Flows | FCGS | -$11 M | -$2 M | +$95 M | +$85 M | +$1,010 M |
FCUQ | +$54 M | +$158 M | +$733 M | +$976 M | +$1,987 M |
FCGS vs FCUQ exposure
Countries
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCGS
FCUQ
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 25, 2023 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGS and FCUQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGS or FCUQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS has returned 9.35% year to date, while FCUQ has returned 13.85%. FCUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGS or FCUQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS manages $1.25 B in assets, while FCUQ manages $2.82 B. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGS and FCUQ managed?
FCGS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGS or FCUQ?
Year to date, FCGS has seen +$94.87 M in net flows, compared with +$733.29 M for FCUQ. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGS and FCUQ compare?
FCGS has an expense ratio of 1.11%, while FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about FCGS and FCUQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.