VS
When evaluating costs, FCID features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.35% for TQCD. Performance-wise, FCID has returned 17.23% year-to-date with +$191 M in net flows, whereas TQCD is at 20.31% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCID
TQCD
| AuM | $450.43 M | $3,871.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.99% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCID | -1.17% | -0.75% | +17.23% | +21.12% | +84.11% |
TQCD | +1.97% | +0.37% | +20.31% | +28.13% | +122.44% | |
| Flows | FCID | +$46 M | +$76 M | +$191 M | +$224 M | +$314 M |
TQCD | +$129 M | +$411 M | +$1,728 M | +$1,993 M | +$2,919 M |
FCID vs TQCD exposure
Countries
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
TQCD
Canada
93.08%
Sectors
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
TQCD
Finance
42.64%
Energy
17.94%
Non-Energy Materials
17.28%
Industrials
8.28%
Other
13.86%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
TQCD
The Bank of Nova Scotia
4.09%
Royal Bank of Canada
3.92%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.82%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
3.69%
Bank of Montreal
3.66%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.61%
National Bank of Canada
3.52%
Barrick Mining Corp.
3.36%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.92%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.86%
Diversification
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
TQCD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 77 total
35.45%
Characteristics
Compare
FCID
TQCD
| Provider | Fidelity | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index TR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.15% | 2.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 18, 2018 | November 26, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCID and TQCD
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCID or TQCD?
As of October 30, 2026, FCID has returned 17.23% year to date, while TQCD has returned 20.31%. TQCD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCID or TQCD?
As of October 30, 2026, FCID manages $450.43 M in assets, while TQCD manages $3.87 B. TQCD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCID and TQCD managed?
FCID is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index TR - CAD benchmark. TQCD is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCID or TQCD?
Year to date, FCID has seen +$191.42 M in net flows, compared with +$1,728.24 M for TQCD. TQCD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCID and TQCD compare?
FCID has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while TQCD has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about FCID and TQCD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.