VS
When evaluating costs, FCQH features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.05% for DMEU. Performance-wise, FCQH has returned 8.83% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas DMEU is at 16.13% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCQH
DMEU
| AuM | $70.05 M | $4,677.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.42% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.51% | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCQH | +1.03% | +3.44% | +8.83% | +7.50% | +63.61% |
DMEU | -0.45% | +3.91% | +16.13% | +13.20% | - | |
| Flows | FCQH | +$0 M | -$2 M | -$5 M | -$6 M | -$3 M |
DMEU | +$222 M | +$561 M | +$1,694 M | +$1,914 M | - |
FCQH vs DMEU exposure
Countries
FCQH
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
USA
97.39%
Sectors
FCQH
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
Technology
45.22%
Finance
13.33%
Healthcare
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.82%
Industrials
7.48%
Other
15.88%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCQH
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.82%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.98%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
FCQH
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 505 total
37.28%
Characteristics
Compare
FCQH
DMEU
| Provider | Fidelity | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.46% | 0.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | April 18, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about FCQH and DMEU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCQH or DMEU?
As of October 27, 2026, FCQH has returned 8.83% year to date, while DMEU has returned 16.13%. DMEU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCQH or DMEU?
As of October 27, 2026, FCQH manages $70.05 M in assets, while DMEU manages $4.68 B. DMEU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCQH and DMEU managed?
FCQH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD benchmark. DMEU is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCQH or DMEU?
Year to date, FCQH has seen -$4.55 M in net flows, compared with +$1,694.39 M for DMEU. DMEU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCQH and DMEU compare?
FCQH has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while DMEU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.