VS
Compare Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral Index ETF (FCQH) vs Fidelity U.S. High Quality Index ETF (FCUQ) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FCQH and FCUQ provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, FCQH features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.35% for FCUQ. Performance-wise, FCQH has returned 3.21% year-to-date with -$8 M in net flows, whereas FCUQ is at 5.75% with +$497 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCQH
FCUQ
| AuM | $63.38 M | $2,402.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.42% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.36% | -0.63% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCQH | +0.06% | +5.60% | +3.21% | +9.33% | +51.83% |
FCUQ | +2.21% | +8.96% | +5.75% | +13.75% | +64.98% | |
| Flows | FCQH | -$5 M | -$8 M | -$8 M | -$0 M | -$29 M |
FCUQ | +$54 M | +$235 M | +$497 M | +$1,066 M | +$1,787 M |
FCQH vs FCUQ exposure
Countries
FCQH
USA
93.10%
FCUQ
USA
93.10%
Sectors
FCQH
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
FCUQ
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCQH
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
FCUQ
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
Diversification
FCQH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
FCUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
Characteristics
Compare
FCQH
FCUQ
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.65% | 0.68% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCQH and FCUQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCQH or FCUQ?
As of June 11, 2026, FCQH has returned 3.21% year to date, while FCUQ has returned 5.75%. FCUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCQH or FCUQ?
As of June 11, 2026, FCQH manages $63.38 M in assets, while FCUQ manages $2.40 B. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCQH and FCUQ managed?
FCQH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD benchmark. FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FCQH and FCUQ emphasize?
FCQH is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. FCUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCQH or FCUQ?
Year to date, FCQH has seen -$7.73 M in net flows, compared with +$496.91 M for FCUQ. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCQH and FCUQ compare?
FCQH has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of FCQH and FCUQ?
FCQH's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. FCUQ's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCQH or FCUQ?
FCQH holds 87 securities, while FCUQ holds 87. On holdings count, FCQH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCQH and FCUQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.