VS
When evaluating costs, FCRU features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FCRU has returned 11% year-to-date with -$1,004 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.25% with -$127 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCRU
ZUT
| AuM | $28.06 M | $853.07 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.11% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCRU | +0.09% | +7.49% | +11.00% | +22.81% | - |
ZUT | +1.08% | +6.43% | +22.25% | +25.92% | +52.94% | |
| Flows | FCRU | +$1 M | -$912 M | -$1,004 M | +$7 M | - |
ZUT | -$5 M | -$67 M | -$127 M | -$50 M | +$186 M |
FCRU vs ZUT exposure
Countries
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%
Sectors
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%
Diversification
FCRU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%
Characteristics
Compare
FCRU
ZUT
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 25, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FCRU and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCRU or ZUT?
As of July 20, 2026, FCRU has returned 11.00% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.25%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCRU or ZUT?
As of July 20, 2026, FCRU manages $28.06 M in assets, while ZUT manages $853.07 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCRU and ZUT managed?
FCRU is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCRU or ZUT?
Year to date, FCRU has seen -$1,003.80 M in net flows, compared with -$127.21 M for ZUT. ZUT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCRU and ZUT compare?
FCRU has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about FCRU and ZUT
Beyond the Benchmark: A Smarter Way to Build the Core
A closer look at Franklin Templeton’s Core Equity ETF Suite (FCRC, FCRU, FCRI).
Posted on 7/7/2026 by Franklin Templeton inEquities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.