VS
When evaluating costs, FCUH features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FCUH has returned 10.87% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.72% with -$462 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUH
HBNK
| AuM | $32.31 M | $787.51 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.41% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.40% | -0.44% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUH | +1.19% | +3.19% | +10.87% | +12.89% | +39.52% |
HBNK | +1.99% | +16.52% | +32.72% | +67.44% | +149.42% | |
| Flows | FCUH | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$14 M | -$32 M |
HBNK | -$33 M | +$8 M | -$462 M | -$768 M | -$7 M |
FCUH vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FCUH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
FCUH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.52%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.09%
Bank of Montreal
16.85%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.38%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.27%
National Bank of Canada
15.89%
Diversification
FCUH
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUH
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral Index TR - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.68% | 2.54% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 18, 2018 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUH and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUH or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, FCUH has returned 10.87% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.72%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUH or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, FCUH manages $32.31 M in assets, while HBNK manages $787.51 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUH and HBNK managed?
FCUH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. High Dividend Currency Neutral Index TR - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUH or HBNK?
Year to date, FCUH has seen +$1.76 M in net flows, compared with -$462.37 M for HBNK. FCUH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUH and HBNK compare?
FCUH has an expense ratio of 0.41%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FCUH and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.