VS
When evaluating costs, FCUL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.08% for VSP. Performance-wise, FCUL has returned 14.45% year-to-date with +$859 M in net flows, whereas VSP is at 10.83% with +$591 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUL
VSP
| AuM | $2,390.79 M | $6,381.53 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.69% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUL | +5.08% | +4.76% | +14.45% | +11.00% | +55.52% |
VSP | -1.44% | +1.96% | +10.83% | +13.06% | +79.71% | |
| Flows | FCUL | +$71 M | +$186 M | +$859 M | +$1,076 M | +$1,997 M |
VSP | +$64 M | +$134 M | +$591 M | +$658 M | +$1,828 M |
FCUL vs VSP exposure
Countries
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
VSP
USA
97.44%
Sectors
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
VSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.57%
Healthcare
9.08%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.88%
Industrials
7.46%
Other
15.76%
As of October 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
VSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.07%
Apple, Inc.
7.03%
Microsoft Corp.
5.69%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.84%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Tesla, Inc.
1.56%
Diversification
FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
VSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.78%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUL
VSP
| Provider | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.40% | 0.87% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | November 2, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUL and VSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUL or VSP?
As of October 22, 2026, FCUL has returned 14.45% year to date, while VSP has returned 10.83%. FCUL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUL or VSP?
As of October 22, 2026, FCUL manages $2.39 B in assets, while VSP manages $6.38 B. VSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUL and VSP managed?
FCUL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark. VSP is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUL or VSP?
Year to date, FCUL has seen +$859.17 M in net flows, compared with +$590.72 M for VSP. FCUL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUL and VSP compare?
FCUL has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while VSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about FCUL and VSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.