FCUL
Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Index ETF

Full FCUL fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, FCUL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, FCUL has returned 11.51% year-to-date with +$706 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 15.7% with +$354 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 5

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 7, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FCUL
+0.04%+8.56%+11.51%+12.39%+49.69%
ZSP
+1.57%+8.23%+15.70%+25.31%+84.92%
Flows
FCUL
+$73 M+$199 M+$706 M+$1,132 M+$1,852 M
ZSP
+$10 M-$117 M+$354 M+$919 M+$5,137 M

FCUL vs ZSP exposure

Countries

FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.59%

Sectors

FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
As of August 7, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%

Diversification

FCUL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%

Characteristics

Compare
FCUL
ZSP
ProviderFidelityBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CADS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.21%0.75%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 24, 2019November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about FCUL and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUL or ZSP?
As of August 7, 2026, FCUL has returned 11.51% year to date, while ZSP has returned 15.70%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUL or ZSP?
As of August 7, 2026, FCUL manages $2.18 B in assets, while ZSP manages $24.69 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUL and ZSP managed?
FCUL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUL or ZSP?
Year to date, FCUL has seen +$705.91 M in net flows, compared with +$354.23 M for ZSP. FCUL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUL and ZSP compare?
FCUL has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about FCUL and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds