VS
Compare Fidelity U.S. High Quality Index ETF (FCUQ) vs BMO MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index ETF (ESGY) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FCUQ provides Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials exposures, while ESGY is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care. When evaluating costs, FCUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.2% for ESGY. Performance-wise, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year-to-date with +$497 M in net flows, whereas ESGY is at 9.66% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUQ
ESGY
| AuM | $2,402.67 M | $189.08 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.23% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | 0.03% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUQ | +2.21% | +8.96% | +5.75% | +13.75% | +64.98% |
ESGY | +1.58% | +12.87% | +9.66% | +26.94% | +85.15% | |
| Flows | FCUQ | +$54 M | +$235 M | +$497 M | +$1,066 M | +$1,787 M |
ESGY | -$4 M | -$3 M | -$0 M | -$15 M | -$2,144 M |
FCUQ vs ESGY exposure
Countries
FCUQ
USA
93.10%
ESGY
USA
95.92%
Sectors
FCUQ
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
ESGY
Information Technology
40.33%
Communication Services
13.47%
Health Care
9.34%
Consumer Discretionary
8.62%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
20.42%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUQ
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
ESGY
NVIDIA
15.76%
MICROSOFT-T
9.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
6.31%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.24%
TESLA
3.27%
LILLY
2.13%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.76%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
1.70%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.70%
MASTERCARD
1.38%
Diversification
FCUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
ESGY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 258 total
48.53%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUQ
ESGY
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD | MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.68% | 0.62% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | January 24, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUQ and ESGY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUQ or ESGY?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year to date, while ESGY has returned 9.66%. ESGY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUQ or ESGY?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ manages $2.40 B in assets, while ESGY manages $189.08 M. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUQ and ESGY managed?
FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ESGY is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI USA Selection NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FCUQ and ESGY emphasize?
FCUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. ESGY is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUQ or ESGY?
Year to date, FCUQ has seen +$496.91 M in net flows, compared with -$0.24 M for ESGY. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUQ and ESGY compare?
FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ESGY has an expense ratio of 0.23%.
What are the top holdings of FCUQ and ESGY?
FCUQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. ESGY's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCUQ or ESGY?
FCUQ holds 87 securities, while ESGY holds 243. On holdings count, ESGY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCUQ and ESGY
Canadian ETF Sustainable Solutions
Sustainable ETF solutions showcased their value during periods of uncertainty in 2023.
Posted on 1/5/2024 by Kyle Anthony inESG
Overview of Smart Beta ETFs
Smart Beta, also known as ‘Strategic Beta,’ provide investors with pure-play access to factor investing.
Posted on 12/27/2023 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.