VS
Compare Fidelity U.S. High Quality Index ETF (FCUQ) vs Fidelity U.S. High Quality Currency Neutral Index ETF (FCQH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FCUQ and FCQH provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, FCUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.38% for FCQH. Performance-wise, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year-to-date with +$497 M in net flows, whereas FCQH is at 3.21% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUQ
FCQH
| AuM | $2,402.67 M | $63.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.38% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.42% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | -0.36% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUQ | +2.21% | +8.96% | +5.75% | +13.75% | +64.98% |
FCQH | +0.06% | +5.60% | +3.21% | +9.33% | +51.83% | |
| Flows | FCUQ | +$54 M | +$235 M | +$497 M | +$1,066 M | +$1,787 M |
FCQH | -$5 M | -$8 M | -$8 M | -$0 M | -$29 M |
FCUQ vs FCQH exposure
Countries
FCUQ
USA
93.10%
FCQH
USA
93.10%
Sectors
FCUQ
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
FCQH
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUQ
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
FCQH
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
Diversification
FCUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
FCQH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUQ
FCQH
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD | Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUQ and FCQH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUQ or FCQH?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year to date, while FCQH has returned 3.21%. FCUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUQ or FCQH?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ manages $2.40 B in assets, while FCQH manages $63.38 M. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUQ and FCQH managed?
FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. FCQH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FCUQ and FCQH emphasize?
FCUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. FCQH is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUQ or FCQH?
Year to date, FCUQ has seen +$496.91 M in net flows, compared with -$7.73 M for FCQH. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUQ and FCQH compare?
FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while FCQH has an expense ratio of 0.42%.
What are the top holdings of FCUQ and FCQH?
FCUQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. FCQH's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCUQ or FCQH?
FCUQ holds 87 securities, while FCQH holds 87. On holdings count, FCUQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCUQ and FCQH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.