VS
When evaluating costs, FCUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.11% for HXS. Performance-wise, FCUQ has returned 14.98% year-to-date with +$731 M in net flows, whereas HXS is at 17.42% with +$510 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUQ
HXS
| AuM | $2,843.25 M | $7,182.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.61% | -0.47% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUQ | +4.01% | +5.04% | +14.98% | +14.06% | +68.47% |
HXS | +4.08% | +3.45% | +17.42% | +17.88% | +88.81% | |
| Flows | FCUQ | +$52 M | +$160 M | +$731 M | +$975 M | +$1,985 M |
HXS | -$661 M | -$573 M | +$510 M | +$938 M | +$2,411 M |
FCUQ vs HXS exposure
Countries
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCUQ
HXS
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Indirect |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.70% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | November 30, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUQ and HXS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUQ or HXS?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUQ has returned 14.98% year to date, while HXS has returned 17.42%. HXS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUQ or HXS?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUQ manages $2.84 B in assets, while HXS manages $7.18 B. HXS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUQ and HXS managed?
FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HXS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUQ or HXS?
Year to date, FCUQ has seen +$731.36 M in net flows, compared with +$510.07 M for HXS. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUQ and HXS compare?
FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HXS has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about FCUQ and HXS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.