FCUQ
Fidelity U.S. High Quality Index ETF

Full FCUQ fund page
VS
PHE.B
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF

Full PHE.B fund page

Fidelity U.S. High Quality Index ETF (FCUQ) and Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund ETF (PHE.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FCUQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials, while PHE.B leans towards Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, FCUQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.95% for PHE.B. Performance-wise, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year-to-date with +$497 M in net flows, whereas PHE.B is at 3.57% with -$17 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FCUQ
+2.21%+8.96%+5.75%+13.75%+64.98%
PHE.B
+2.29%+5.21%+3.57%+14.31%+46.00%
Flows
FCUQ
+$54 M+$235 M+$497 M+$1,066 M+$1,787 M
PHE.B
-$1 M-$18 M-$17 M-$15 M-$12 M

FCUQ vs PHE.B exposure

Countries

FCUQ
USA
93.10%
PHE.B
USA
92.99%
Other
7.01%

Sectors

FCUQ
Information Technology
42.46%
Consumer Discretionary
13.58%
Industrials
12.27%
Consumer Staples
9.99%
Other
21.70%
PHE.B
Information Technology
34.80%
Consumer Discretionary
11.48%
Communication Services
11.08%
Financials
10.14%
Industrials
9.67%
Health Care
7.78%
Other
15.05%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FCUQ
NVIDIA
8.41%
APPLE
6.51%
MICROSOFT-T
5.28%
NEWMONT CORP
3.73%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.35%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.27%
CATERPILLAR
2.21%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.07%
ALTRIA GROUP
2.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.00%
PHE.B
NVIDIA
9.65%
APPLE
7.45%
ALPHABET INC-CL
7.26%
MICROSOFT-T
5.57%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.87%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.60%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
JPMORGAN CHASE
2.20%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.04%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
1.98%

Diversification

FCUQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
37.91%
PHE.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
46.02%

Characteristics

Compare
FCUQ
PHE.B
ProviderFidelityPurpose Investments
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkFidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.68%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 24, 2019April 29, 2014

Frequently asked questions about FCUQ and PHE.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUQ or PHE.B?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ has returned 5.75% year to date, while PHE.B has returned 3.57%. FCUQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUQ or PHE.B?
As of June 11, 2026, FCUQ manages $2.40 B in assets, while PHE.B manages $6.82 M. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUQ and PHE.B managed?
FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. PHE.B is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FCUQ and PHE.B emphasize?
FCUQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Industrials. PHE.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUQ or PHE.B?
Year to date, FCUQ has seen +$496.91 M in net flows, compared with -$16.53 M for PHE.B. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUQ and PHE.B compare?
FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while PHE.B has an expense ratio of 0.94%.
What are the top holdings of FCUQ and PHE.B?
FCUQ's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T. PHE.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCUQ or PHE.B?
FCUQ holds 87 securities, while PHE.B holds 78. On holdings count, FCUQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about FCUQ and PHE.B

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds