VS
When evaluating costs, FCUV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.05% for DMEU. Performance-wise, FCUV has returned 17.94% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas DMEU is at 17.82% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUV
DMEU
| AuM | $4,512.44 M | $4,626.68 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.83% | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUV | +1.74% | +0.14% | +17.94% | +24.57% | +102.72% |
DMEU | +4.22% | +3.55% | +17.82% | +18.01% | - | |
| Flows | FCUV | +$221 M | +$637 M | +$1,848 M | +$2,173 M | +$3,407 M |
DMEU | +$152 M | +$409 M | +$1,578 M | +$1,829 M | - |
FCUV vs DMEU exposure
Countries
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
USA
97.39%
Sectors
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
Technology
45.22%
Finance
13.33%
Healthcare
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.82%
Industrials
7.48%
Other
15.88%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.82%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.98%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
DMEU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 505 total
37.28%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUV
DMEU
| Provider | Fidelity | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.49% | 0.79% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | April 18, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUV and DMEU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUV or DMEU?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUV has returned 17.94% year to date, while DMEU has returned 17.82%. FCUV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUV or DMEU?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUV manages $4.51 B in assets, while DMEU manages $4.63 B. DMEU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUV and DMEU managed?
FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. DMEU is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUV or DMEU?
Year to date, FCUV has seen +$1,847.85 M in net flows, compared with +$1,578.22 M for DMEU. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUV and DMEU compare?
FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while DMEU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCUV and DMEU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.