VS
When evaluating costs, FCUV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.11% for HXS. Performance-wise, FCUV has returned 17.94% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas HXS is at 17.42% with +$510 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUV
HXS
| AuM | $4,512.44 M | $7,182.46 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.83% | -0.47% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUV | +1.74% | +0.14% | +17.94% | +24.57% | +102.72% |
HXS | +4.08% | +3.45% | +17.42% | +17.88% | +88.81% | |
| Flows | FCUV | +$221 M | +$637 M | +$1,848 M | +$2,173 M | +$3,407 M |
HXS | -$661 M | -$573 M | +$510 M | +$938 M | +$2,411 M |
FCUV vs HXS exposure
Countries
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCUV
HXS
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Indirect |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | November 30, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUV and HXS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUV or HXS?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUV has returned 17.94% year to date, while HXS has returned 17.42%. FCUV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUV or HXS?
As of October 15, 2026, FCUV manages $4.51 B in assets, while HXS manages $7.18 B. HXS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUV and HXS managed?
FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HXS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUV or HXS?
Year to date, FCUV has seen +$1,847.85 M in net flows, compared with +$510.07 M for HXS. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUV and HXS compare?
FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while HXS has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about FCUV and HXS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.