VS
Compare Fidelity U.S. Value Index ETF (FCUV) vs Mackenzie Cyclical Tilt ETF (MCYC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FCUV provides Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials exposures, while MCYC is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials. When evaluating costs, FCUV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.55% for MCYC. Performance-wise, FCUV has returned 12.72% year-to-date with +$992 M in net flows, whereas MCYC is at 13.66% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUV
MCYC
| AuM | $3,536.42 M | $3.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.98% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUV | +3.38% | +12.07% | +12.72% | +37.53% | +101.95% |
MCYC | +2.48% | +16.55% | +13.66% | - | - | |
| Flows | FCUV | +$202 M | +$537 M | +$992 M | +$1,651 M | +$2,632 M |
MCYC | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | - | - |
FCUV vs MCYC exposure
Countries
FCUV
USA
96.03%
MCYC
USA
92.06%
Other
7.94%
Sectors
FCUV
Information Technology
30.64%
Consumer Discretionary
15.38%
Financials
14.27%
Industrials
13.81%
Materials
9.12%
Utilities
8.40%
Other
8.38%
MCYC
Information Technology
29.52%
Industrials
19.93%
Financials
14.78%
Consumer Discretionary
10.79%
Other
24.98%
As of June 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUV
NVIDIA
6.36%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
5.19%
AMAZON.COM INC
5.09%
APPLE
4.92%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL
4.33%
PG&E
4.07%
MICROSOFT-T
3.96%
NEWMONT CORP
3.94%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.45%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
2.44%
MCYC
NVIDIA
4.40%
APPLE
3.30%
MICROSOFT-T
2.44%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.89%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
1.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
0.82%
MORGAN STANLEY
0.79%
JPMORGAN CHASE
0.79%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
0.76%
Diversification
FCUV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 87 total
42.75%
MCYC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 238 total
18.49%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUV
MCYC
| Provider | Fidelity | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | September 3, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUV and MCYC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUV or MCYC?
As of June 10, 2026, FCUV has returned 12.72% year to date, while MCYC has returned 13.66%. MCYC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUV or MCYC?
As of June 10, 2026, FCUV manages $3.54 B in assets, while MCYC manages $3.67 M. FCUV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUV and MCYC managed?
FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. MCYC is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FCUV and MCYC emphasize?
FCUV is most exposed to Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary, and Financials. MCYC is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUV or MCYC?
Year to date, FCUV has seen +$992.33 M in net flows, compared with +$1.09 M for MCYC. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUV and MCYC compare?
FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while MCYC has an expense ratio of 0.55%.
What are the top holdings of FCUV and MCYC?
FCUV's largest holdings include NVIDIA, CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, and AMAZON.COM INC. MCYC's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCUV or MCYC?
FCUV holds 87 securities, while MCYC holds 235. On holdings count, MCYC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCUV and MCYC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.