VS
When evaluating costs, FCVH features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.11% for HXS. Performance-wise, FCVH has returned 13.74% year-to-date with +$121 M in net flows, whereas HXS is at 15.81% with +$538 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCVH
HXS
| AuM | $385.33 M | $7,111.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.41% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.96% | -0.47% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCVH | +3.14% | -0.94% | +13.74% | +20.19% | +96.41% |
HXS | -0.49% | +3.49% | +15.81% | +13.45% | +92.47% | |
| Flows | FCVH | +$18 M | +$35 M | +$121 M | +$167 M | +$282 M |
HXS | +$40 M | -$578 M | +$538 M | +$966 M | +$2,523 M |
FCVH vs HXS exposure
Countries
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
HXS
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCVH
HXS
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Indirect |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | November 30, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FCVH and HXS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCVH or HXS?
As of October 28, 2026, FCVH has returned 13.74% year to date, while HXS has returned 15.81%. HXS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCVH or HXS?
As of October 28, 2026, FCVH manages $385.33 M in assets, while HXS manages $7.11 B. HXS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCVH and HXS managed?
FCVH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HXS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCVH or HXS?
Year to date, FCVH has seen +$121.31 M in net flows, compared with +$538.14 M for HXS. HXS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCVH and HXS compare?
FCVH has an expense ratio of 0.41%, while HXS has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about FCVH and HXS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.